What is nuclear fission: some physics

Atoms are made up of a central nucleus, and "orbiting" electrons. The nucleus is made of protons and neutrons. Protons and electrons are charged: protons are positively charged, and electrons are negatively charged. The magnitude of their charge is the same, but the sign is opposite.

An "atom" is not charged overall, by definition (a charged particle is called an "ion"), and therefore has the same number of protons and neutrons (so that the charges balance).

The element is determined by the number of protons and electrons. For example, one proton is called Hydrogen, two protons is called Helium, three is Lithium and so on.

Protons and neutrons are held together in the nucleus by the nuclear force. In a physical sense, when you apply a force to something, say pushing a box, you are transferring energy from yourself to the box. The opposite it also true.

In simple terms, the force "field" is a store of energy, and when this field breaks down, it releases the energy it stores.

In nuclear fission, heavy atoms are encouraged to decay, to break apart into smaller atoms. Because less energy is required to hold two smaller nuclei together than one large one, there is a net release of energy.

How much energy is released during nuclear fission?

Let's assume a reaction. Atom X decays by fission into atoms Y and Z. What we find is that the mass of atom X is greater than the mass of Y and Z combined. There is a loss of mass during the decay, known as a mass deficit.

Now we apply one of Physics' best known equations: E=mc2. E stands for "energy", m stands for "mass" and c is the speed of light. m is the mass deficit in this case. The value of c2, that is c x c, is huge. The value of c is 300000000 metres per second. This means that even a tiny mass deficit can translate into a substantial amount of energy.

In fact, and I believe this is the third time this quote appears on this site,

At the atomic level, the thermal energy released in a fission event is 200MeV, compared with only a few electron-volts produced each time a hydrocarbon molecule is broken down by burning carbon-based fuels. As a result, a single nuclear-reactor fuel pellet just 1cm long can produce the same amount of electricity of 1.5 tonnes of coal.

Source: P. Norman, A. Worrall, K. Hesketh, Physics World, Vol 20, No 7, July 2007, page 25

Quite a lot, then!

What is the fuel for nuclear fission?

The primary fuel used for nuclear fission is Uranium 235. We use U-235 because it is one of the easiest of the fissile materials to use for controlled fission, but others can be used as well, for example, Thorium.

It is also a result of the fact that nuclear power research was developed alongside nuclear weapons research, so that the one complemented the other, and Uranium can be used in nuclear fission bombs.

How does nuclear fission work?

There are many kinds of nuclear reactor in existence and in development which make apply this process. I won't discuss them all here, however. The idea, though, is to develop a controlled chain reaction.

Uranium does decay on its own but not in the way we force it to in nuclear reactors. The process must be started by us, by firing a neutron at the Uranium. One nucleus (parent) will capture it, which will cause it to become even more unstable, causing it to decay by fission into two almost equally sized products (daughters).

The important thing is that it also emits a few free neutrons in the process, which then do the same thing again with other nearby Uranium nuclei. In a bomb, this process is uncontrolled and so more and more nuclei decay until.... well, yes.

In a reactor, however, this process is controlled such that the number of neutrons flying around can be adjusted. This way, a steady number of decays can be achieved and a steady amount of power can be released.

Top ↑

Return to nuclear fission from what is nuclear fission

Who am I?

My name is Michael, I'm a postgraduate student studying Environmental Technology, specialising in energy policy. I have an undergraduate degree in Physics.

I discovered my interest in energy during the second year of my Physics degree, in a module called "Environmental Physics". It was a very general course and covered topics which would be completely inappropriate here (dry adiabatic lapse rate, anyone?) but it was enough to make me want to learn more about the other aspects of energy and the environment, away from pure Physics.

This site, my postgraduate studies, and hopefully a career are due to that interest.

More...

Contact me

I welcome your comments, questions and criticisms (constructive, please!). You can contact me on the contact page.

Newsletter

If there is demand for it, I would like to send a monthly newsletter with site updates, news from the world of energy and the environment and such. I promise not to send anything even resembling spam!

Please register your interest using the form on this page. If there is enough interest, I will endeavour to make it the best newsletter I can!

Recommended Reading: Sustainable Energy - without the hot air

Amazon UK

Amazon US

If there is one book I would recommend to clarify the energy issues we face, it would be "Sustainable Energy - without the hot air" by David MacKay. A physics professor at the University of Cambridge (UK), MacKay deals with the topic entirely from an analytical point of view.

This book is almost constantly open on my desk for reference; no other book I've read has come close to the clarity of this one. There is no politics, no social consideration or economics, just the plain numbers behind how much we use and how much each source of energy can give us.

Numbers don't lie. Don't worry about being told to change your lifestyle - another book will do that, no doubt. This one will give you the tools you need to come to informed conclusions about energy, and I cannot recommend it highly enough. If you buy a single book on the topic, make it this one.

You can see the book's website at withouthotair.com.