What Is The Atmosphere Made Of?

I am going to be talking about the effect of greenhouse gases, specifically CO2 on the climate, so it is worth taking a moment to look at how much of it makes up the atmosphere. Here is a rough outline of the gases in the atmosphere:

As you can see, the majority is Nitrogen, a mostly non reactive gas. It is interesting that there's so little CO2 though, isn't it? When we talk about changing the concentration of it in the atmosphere, we realise that a little bit can make a large difference, as you'll see further on. So... what is climate change?

The main idea behind climate change is that as the levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere increase, the atmosphere retains energy and increases in temperature (on average) due to the greenhouse effect. As the levels of greenhouse gases increase, the temperature is expected to follow.

How Do We Know It's Not Natural?

We know what the carbon dioxide concentrations have been for the last 400,000 years, and we know roughly what the conditions were at each point (temperature, and such). Take a look at this graph:

So, there are the carbon dioxide concentrations, and corresponding average temperatures for the past 400 000 years, taken from ice core data at Vostok, Russia. I quite like it, personally, because it shows such a good correlation between CO2 and temperature. As CO2 goes up, temperature goes up too. Notice that temperature does tend to lag behind CO2 somewhat, indicating that CO2 rising is the cause of the temperature rising, not the other way round. They're so close, however, that it is hard to be certain.

There's something far more important to note about this graph, though. Notice, that the CO2 concentration has never really exceeded the range 180-~290 ppm (with a spike to 300ppm at one point). In the last 400,000 years, the concentration has stayed in that band.

Just to be clear, ppm stands for "parts per million". 280ppm of CO2 is the equivalent of 0.028% of the atmosphere. Put another way, the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere has never exceeded 0.018-0.030% in the past 400,000 years.

Notice also the difference in temperature between when the CO2 concentration was 180ppm (say at about 140,000 years ago) and when the CO2 concentration was 280ppm or so (shortly thereafter). It's about 12 degrees (roughly -9 to +3). That's what a difference of 100ppm makes.

The plot's about to thicken, let me show you another graph (this time of more recently):

a graph of recent co2 concentrations

Global atmospheric concentration of CO2, http://maps.grida.no/go/graphic/global_atmospheric_concentration_of_co21 (Last visited September 5, 2008). Is this proof of global warming?

Forgive the slightly tacky buildings and plane! As you can see, just as the industrial revolution started the CO2 concentration was hovering around 280ppm, so within the range of the previous 400,000 years. Then, we happened, and in the space of just over 100 years, the CO2 concentration jumped to 370ppm in 2000 (384.8ppm in 2008), so it has now risen by another 100ppm.

We saw earlier that sometimes the CO2 increase preceded the temperature increase. As such, we are now starting to see global temperatures slowly creeping up.

Conclusion

So, there it is, the "proof of global warming"in a nutshell. Do not believe people who say there's no hard evidence for climate change, as these are just the basics! Also bear in mind that proof is very hard to come by in science, especially with such a huge and complicated subject. There is a lot of evidence for global warming, but there may never be any definitive proof of global warming.

In fact, if you do find some proof of global warming, send some over and I'll claim your Nobel Prize on your behalf....

Top ↑

Return to what is global warming from proof of global warming

Who am I?

My name is Michael, I'm a postgraduate student studying Environmental Technology, specialising in energy policy. I have an undergraduate degree in Physics.

I discovered my interest in energy during the second year of my Physics degree, in a module called "Environmental Physics". It was a very general course and covered topics which would be completely inappropriate here (dry adiabatic lapse rate, anyone?) but it was enough to make me want to learn more about the other aspects of energy and the environment, away from pure Physics.

This site, my postgraduate studies, and hopefully a career are due to that interest.

More...

Contact me

I welcome your comments, questions and criticisms (constructive, please!). You can contact me on the contact page.

Newsletter

If there is demand for it, I would like to send a monthly newsletter with site updates, news from the world of energy and the environment and such. I promise not to send anything even resembling spam!

Please register your interest using the form on this page. If there is enough interest, I will endeavour to make it the best newsletter I can!

Recommended Reading: Sustainable Energy - without the hot air

Amazon UK

Amazon US

If there is one book I would recommend to clarify the energy issues we face, it would be "Sustainable Energy - without the hot air" by David MacKay. A physics professor at the University of Cambridge (UK), MacKay deals with the topic entirely from an analytical point of view.

This book is almost constantly open on my desk for reference; no other book I've read has come close to the clarity of this one. There is no politics, no social consideration or economics, just the plain numbers behind how much we use and how much each source of energy can give us.

Numbers don't lie. Don't worry about being told to change your lifestyle - another book will do that, no doubt. This one will give you the tools you need to come to informed conclusions about energy, and I cannot recommend it highly enough. If you buy a single book on the topic, make it this one.

You can see the book's website at withouthotair.com.