Efficiency

Nuclear plants can produce a large amount of electricity, up to about 2GW, which is comparable to coal plants. More importantly, however, is the amount of fuel required to generate this energy.

At the atomic level, the thermal energy released in a fission event is 200MeV, compared with only a few electron-volts produced each time a hydrocarbon molecule is broken down by burning carbon-based fuels. As a result, a single nuclear-reactor fuel pellet just 1cm long can produce the same amount of electricity of 1.5 tonnes of coal.

Source: P. Norman, A. Worrall, K. Hesketh, Physics World, Vol 20, No 7, July 2007, page 25

Reliability

There is no need to worry about interruptions to the power supply: as long as there is uranium, there will be power. This is a stark contrast to most renewable energies which depend on the activity of the weather.

As a result of this, nuclear power would be suitable for providing a base load which would be present at all times. Pumped storage and renewables could then provide temporary energy to cope with spikes in demand.

No greenhouse gases

There are some greenhouse gas emissions associated with the life cycle of uranium, as gases are emitted as it is mined and transported and so forth, however this is significantly less than the emissions associated with the burning of fossil fuels.

Essentially, nuclear power would be "carbon-zero" if the the uranium were mined and transported in a more efficient way. There are of course issues with radioactive waste, however.

Supply

It cannot last forever, but at least the fuel is more easily accessible than oil. 24% of uranium resources are in Australia, and 9% in Canada (source). These are hardly politically unstable regions.

Safety

We frequently hear reports of explosions at gas plants, accidents at oil refineries, even dams breaking. The fact is that nuclear power has in fact caused fewer deaths than fossil fuels.

It could be argued that this is because its implementation is not as widespread, but the fact remains: as long as the reactor is well designed and waste is properly dealt with, the risks of death are minimal. Take a look at this graph for more details:

Granted, the explosion of a gas facility would not be dangerous over such a vast area as the accident at Chernobyl was, however modern reactor design eliminates this risk.

Top ↑

Return to nuclear fission from advantages of nuclear power

Who am I?

My name is Michael, I'm a postgraduate student studying Environmental Technology, specialising in energy policy. I have an undergraduate degree in Physics.

I discovered my interest in energy during the second year of my Physics degree, in a module called "Environmental Physics". It was a very general course and covered topics which would be completely inappropriate here (dry adiabatic lapse rate, anyone?) but it was enough to make me want to learn more about the other aspects of energy and the environment, away from pure Physics.

This site, my postgraduate studies, and hopefully a career are due to that interest.

More...

Contact me

I welcome your comments, questions and criticisms (constructive, please!). You can contact me on the contact page.

Newsletter

If there is demand for it, I would like to send a monthly newsletter with site updates, news from the world of energy and the environment and such. I promise not to send anything even resembling spam!

Please register your interest using the form on this page. If there is enough interest, I will endeavour to make it the best newsletter I can!

Recommended Reading: Sustainable Energy - without the hot air

Amazon UK

Amazon US

If there is one book I would recommend to clarify the energy issues we face, it would be "Sustainable Energy - without the hot air" by David MacKay. A physics professor at the University of Cambridge (UK), MacKay deals with the topic entirely from an analytical point of view.

This book is almost constantly open on my desk for reference; no other book I've read has come close to the clarity of this one. There is no politics, no social consideration or economics, just the plain numbers behind how much we use and how much each source of energy can give us.

Numbers don't lie. Don't worry about being told to change your lifestyle - another book will do that, no doubt. This one will give you the tools you need to come to informed conclusions about energy, and I cannot recommend it highly enough. If you buy a single book on the topic, make it this one.

You can see the book's website at withouthotair.com.